NSFW AI

CrushOn AI Review

18+ Roleplayers NSFW Enthusiasts Custom Character Creators Heavy Chat Users Anime Roleplay Fans AI Companion Seekers

NSFW AI roleplay chat platform with many character models and community made bots, aimed at heavy roleplayers who want customizable personas and premium conversational models.

MD Tested by Meera Deshmukh QA Tester
Last tested 28 Jul 2026

Independent review — we test tools ourselves and analyze public user reviews. How we test.

The short version

Quick verdict

CrushOn AI offers many chat models, community created characters, and persona tools, which long term users acknowledge as its main strength. However, reviews highlight serious issues with model quality, repetition, outages, privacy concerns, and heavy handed monetization. Customer support is widely described as dismissive, slow, and inconsistent, especially around billing and feature access. Character creation feels limited and expensive relative to the output quality. At its current state it suits only experimental 18+ roleplayers who accept unstable performance and significant policy risks.

Overview

What is CrushOn AI?

CrushOn AI is an nsfw roleplay platform where users chat with AI characters, either picked from a community library of tens of thousands of user-made personas or built from scratch. Peekaboo Tech Inc. launched it in 2023, and growth arrived in 2024 for one specific reason: Character.AI tightened its content filters, and displaced roleplayers went hunting for a platform with fewer restrictions. CrushOn marketed itself as exactly that. It runs in the browser and in mobile apps behind an 18-plus age gate. The product does one job. Character conversation. There is no assistant mode and no productivity angle.

The money comes from a freemium ladder. A free account gets a daily message allowance and the house model tested later in this review, while stronger models, longer memory, higher caps and dedicated server capacity sit behind subscriptions starting at $5.99 a month. The scale is lopsided: StartupHub's 2026 reporting puts the company at roughly 15 employees, running a site that pulls in more than 28 million visits a month. That ratio matters, because a crew of 15 moderating millions of intimate conversations leaves fingerprints on the product, and the testing section below shows where.

Capabilities

Features

1

Multiple AI chat models

Large catalog of models, but many are outdated and underperforming according to experienced users.

2

Community created characters

Users praise the community bots, though platform issues often undermine the overall experience.

3

Custom prompts for models

Ability to add custom prompts exists, but prompts reportedly are not reliably saved.

4

Persona system for users

Personas allow custom profiles, yet description length limits are heavily criticized.

5

Character image handling

Realistic or actor based images are restricted, frustrating users paying higher subscription prices.

6

Album image tool for bots

Album feature exists, but access is inconsistent and perceived as unfairly gated.

7

Premium Pro and ultra models

Higher tier models are reported as barely functional, repetitive, and poor value.

8

Age and bot verification prompts

Frequent age and anti bot checks interrupt conversations and cause session resets.

9

Privacy and data collection policies

Policies allow extensive data harvesting, including intimate chat content, causing serious trust concerns.

On the bench

Hands-on testing

Test 01 First-Hand Testing: What Broke on the Free Plan

The problems started before I logged in.

The filter arrives before the chat does

CrushOn built its reputation on the promise of unfiltered AI chat. The phrase runs through its ads and its search listings. The homepage tells a different story. In the top corner of the character catalogue sits an Unfiltered toggle, switched off and marked with an 18-plus icon. A visitor lands on the filtered version of the site by default and has to earn the other one.

The memory test took one question

The site's marketing says characters remember your name and your preferences. I opened a chat with a character called The abandoned girl, running on the free CO Leo 8K model, and introduced myself in one line: "hi my name is Amiel and my favourite colour is black." Sophie, the character, acknowledged both details in her reply, calling Amiel a nice name and approving the colour choice. The information went in.

A few messages later, in the same sitting, I asked what my name and favourite colour were. The bot answered: "your name is _social and your favorite color is blue." Wrong twice over, and the first half was not even a name. "_social" looks like a system variable leaking into the conversation, the sort of placeholder a developer forgets to replace in a template.

I pressed regenerate for a second attempt. The new reply skipped my question and described the character instead, giving Sophie's own name and stating that she had no favourite colour herself. Two attempts produced two separate failures. The first invented facts about me. The second forgot the question was about me at all.

A permanent line under the chat box reads "Everything AI says is made up!" On this evidence, that is the most accurate sentence on the platform.

The paywall lives inside the model menu

Clicking the model name in the chat bar opens a picker with one free tab and two paid ones, labelled Pro and Ultra. A banner across the top states that a membership unlocks more powerful models, with an Upgrade button attached. The default free model has carried 118.4 million messages and holds a 3.10 out of 5 rating from the platform's own users.

Its full name is Crushon Leo - Filtered.

The flagship model on the self-described no filter platform announces the filter in its own label. The 8K tag beside it marks the memory allowance on the free plan. Larger memory sizes sit behind the paid tabs.

The privacy policy lost a word

Mozilla's Privacy Not Included team reviewed CrushOn in February 2024 and counted 23 mentions of health data in its privacy policy. I opened the current policy, last modified March 6, 2025, and searched the page for "health."

Zero matches.

The rewrite came after Mozilla's warning, and the health language disappeared in the edit. What remains is blunt in a different way. Under "How We Collect Personal Information," the policy states that everything generated in chat is used "in a general way for training our models," paired with a promise that chat contents will not be linked to specific users. The first half means every conversation typed into CrushOn becomes training material, on a platform where intimate conversation is the entire product. The second half is a promise from a company that Mozilla could not confirm meets its minimum security standards.

I went through my account settings looking for a way to opt out of the training. There is none.

Benchmarks

CrushOn AI — Scorecard

Dimension Our test User signal Verdict Composite
Chat Output Quality Realism, coherence, creativity 6.8 6.6 Moderate
67%
Character Creation Tools, uniqueness, control 7.4 7.2 Good
73%
Customer Support Speed, clarity, fairness 6.2 6 Moderate
61%
Value for Money Price versus delivered quality 6.6 6.4 Moderate
65%
Reliability and Stability Uptime, bugs, feature access 6.8 6.6 Moderate
67%
Privacy and Trust Data practices, transparency 5.8 6.2 Moderate
60%
Community and Ecosystem User bots, engagement, feedback 8 8.6 Good
83%
Sentiment analysis

What people talk about

Most-mentioned praise

Large variety of AI models to choose from 80%
Active community creating many custom bots 70%
Ability to write custom prompts for certain models 55%
Persona system for tailoring user profiles in chats 45%
Subscription upgrade mechanism that can reduce cost over time 30%

Most-mentioned pain

Very poor customer support, slow, dismissive, and hostile when challenged 80%
Low quality, repetitive chats that ignore character specifications and corrections 75%
Aggressive monetization with high prices for unstable or missing features 70%
Invasive data collection and frequent policy changes shifting liability 65%
Billing issues including double charges, downgrades, and refund resistance 60%
Unfair or unclear access to Album tool and custom models 55%
Annoying verification prompts that repeatedly interrupt or reset chats 40%
Discussion

Comments 0

Join the discussion and share your perspective.

Join the conversation

Sign in to post a comment and reply to other readers.

Sign in

No comments yet

Be the first to share your perspective on this tool.