NSFW AI

Secrets AI Review

AI Companion Fans Erotic Roleplayers Storytelling Enthusiasts Lonely Adults Visual Roleplayers Custom Character Creators

Secrets.ai is an AI companion and roleplay platform for people who want realistic chatbots plus built in image and video generation, with strong memory and deep character customization for long running scenarios.

MD Tested by Meera Deshmukh QA Tester
Last tested 31 Aug 2026

Independent review — we test tools ourselves and analyze public user reviews. How we test.

The short version

Quick verdict

Secrets.ai delivers convincing AI companions with strong long term memory, engaging roleplay and high quality image and video generation. Many users say conversations feel close to talking with a real person and praise the depth of custom characters. The main weaknesses are inconsistent image adherence to prompts, occasional chat glitches or repetition, and a mixed record on support responsiveness plus higher pricing. It is best suited to users who value immersive narrative experiences and are willing to tolerate some quirks and costs for richer AI companionship.

Overview

What is Secrets AI?

Secrets AI is a web-based AI companion platform from Secret Labs Inc., a Delaware company that launched the service in 2024 and has since passed 100,000 users. You create or pick a character, then talk to it through text chat and live voice calls, with AI-generated images or video on top, all tied to one companion that holds memory across conversations. What separates it from a plain chatbot is integration. The same character you build can appear in a generated photo and later recall what you told it last week, without you moving between separate tools.

The catch is the pricing model. A subscription unlocks features, but most media runs on a separate token currency called Moments, so a single voice call or a batch of images quietly drains a balance that the flat monthly fee never covers. Privacy is the other pitch, marketed through anonymous signup and discreet billing, though those promises rest on the company’s own word rather than an independent audit. The platform suits readers who want believable companionship and visual creation in one place and accept a premium price for keeping both under one roof.

Capabilities

Features

1

AI companion chat

Highly praised for natural, engaging conversations that often feel like talking to real people.

2

Long term memory system

Frequently highlighted for remembering details and sustaining deep, ongoing relationships and storylines.

3

Image generation (2K and Advanced)

Valued for quality but criticized for occasional glitches and weak prompt adherence in complex scenes.

4

Video generation

Considered impressive quality, although pricing is seen as high for longer or voiced clips.

5

Custom character creation

Praised for depth of appearance and personality controls, though publishing rules can feel opaque.

6

Group chats with companions

Loved for realistic multi character interactions, but limited to three bots and occasional thinking stalls.

7

Personas and memory groups

Appreciated by power users for building complex, persistent narratives across multiple chats.

8

Content safety and moderation

Provides guardrails, yet sometimes over flags stories or frustrates users seeking fewer restrictions.

9

Web and mobile interface

Generally usable but some reviewers call the UI patchy, cluttered, and search or syncing unreliable.

On the bench

Hands-on testing

Test 01 Testing Secrets AI in Practice

I set up a free account and put the platform through a run of tests built around its headline claims. Every screenshot below comes from my own session.

Memory: an impressive start with a real crack

Memory is the feature Secrets AI sells hardest, so I tested it first. I opened my chat with the Apex companion by stating four facts about myself in a single message.

My opening message, with the chat and media features visible on the right.

The immediate confirmation was accurate. It repeated back the golden retriever named Waffle, the October half marathon, the cilantro I dislike, and my fondness for banana.

Fifteen messages later I asked it to tell me what I like and dislike without scrolling up. Three of the four came back correctly. The fourth did not. My love of banana had vanished, replaced by a claim that I hate coffee, something I never told it.

Recall after fifteen messages: three facts right, one fabricated.

That single swap matters. Short-term echo works well, yet persistent recall dropped one detail and invented another in its place. For a product whose main promise is a companion who remembers you, that gap earns a mention in any honest review.

Voice calls: the meter runs fast

The Call Me button starts a live voice conversation. Apex answered in a natural voice and the audio held together without stutter.

A live voice call in progress.

I kept the call to 29 seconds. When it ended, the receipt showed the cost: 25 Moments.

The end-of-call receipt: 25 Moments for 29 seconds.

That works out to roughly 52 Moments for each minute of talking. The top Ultimate plan grants 15,000 Moments a month. Spend the whole allowance on voice and you get under five hours of conversation, with no Moments left for images or video. The talk feature is polished, and it empties your balance at speed.

Personas sit behind the top tier

I tried to create a persona and hit a wall. The feature is locked to the Ultimate subscription, which advertises 15,000 Moments a month, plus group chats and priority generation.

Persona creation is gated behind the Ultimate plan.

Anyone on the free tier or a lower plan will not touch this feature at all.

Building a companion: more depth than expected

The custom builder runs through nine steps, opening with gender and style.

Step one of nine in the companion builder.

Aggregated reviews often call the customization shallow. My experience pushed back on that. A nine-step flow handed me far more control over appearance and personality than a quick row of sliders would suggest. The depth is there when you build from scratch instead of editing a preset.

Image generation: strong prompt adherence

The Generation Studio takes a text prompt and produces a still or a video. I wrote a detailed prompt for a woman in her mid-20s inside a bright city café, wearing a cream blouse with high-waisted jeans, shot in soft natural daylight.

The exact prompt I fed into the Generation Studio.

The result matched nearly every element I specified. The café backdrop, the outfit, the lighting, and the relaxed composition all came through.

The generated image from that prompt.

Facial features and skin texture held up well, with no warped hands or obvious artifacts in this generation. Prompt adherence is a real strength here.

Benchmarks

Secrets AI — Scorecard

Dimension Our test User signal Verdict Composite
Conversational Quality Realism, coherence, repetition 8.5 9 Excellent
88%
Memory and Continuity Recall and long term context 8.8 9.2 Excellent
90%
Image and Video Quality Visual fidelity and adherence 7.8 7.5 Good
77%
Ease of Use UI, navigation, setup 7.2 7 Good
71%
Customer Support Response speed and helpfulness 6 5.5 Weak
58%
Value for Money Perceived fairness of pricing 7 7.2 Good
71%
Sentiment analysis

What people talk about

Most-mentioned praise

Chats often feel realistic, natural, and emotionally engaging 80%
Strong long term memory that preserves detailed relationships and history 75%
High quality 2K images and videos praised as top notch by many users 70%
Deep roleplay capabilities with adaptable personas and multi character stories 68%
Flexible character creation allowing nuanced personalities and appearances 60%
Premium and Ultimate tiers provide plenty of moments for experimentation 45%
Community and resources, including guides, help improve prompting and setups 40%

Most-mentioned pain

Customer support can be slow, unresponsive, or ticket based systems feel unreliable 80%
Image and video generations sometimes ignore prompts or produce deformed outputs 75%
Pricing for talk, premium images, and videos is frequently described as expensive 65%
Chat can glitch, repeat feelings, or lose context after longer use 60%
Interface, search, and cross device syncing feel clunky for some users 45%
Content safety filters and moderation occasionally over flag or frustrate usage 40%
Group chats limited to three companions and sometimes stall on thinking 30%
Discussion

Comments 0

Join the discussion and share your perspective.

Join the conversation

Sign in to post a comment and reply to other readers.

Sign in

No comments yet

Be the first to share your perspective on this tool.